You see, we, like David, are tempted to assume that because someone is
good, what he or she says will always be good. But, in reality, sometimes “good”
men bring bad news; and sometimes “bad” men bring good news. The terms
“good” and “bad” are not used in their strictest sense here, but here’s what I
mean by my assertion: When we know someone—preacher, teacher, friend, etc., and
they truly are good (or as good as sinful man can be), we are apt to attribute
more credence to what he or she says, simply because we know, or think we know,
they have our best interest at heart. Yet there are those among them who may
cherish our friendship and admiration so much that they would hesitate to tell
us the truth. And, of course, they could just be mistaken. One way or the
other, sincerity does not guarantee truth.
By the same token, there are those who, for one
reason or another, make us skeptical of what they say. They may have an
abundance of faults; we may feel they harbor a real or perceived prejudice
against us; or they may just have less than appealing communication skills.
Whatever it is, you and I may want to reject anything they say straightaway,
forgetting that God can use any means He chooses to enlighten us—even if it’s a
jackass (Num.22)! I say this not to make us suspicious of the “good man,” but
to keep us from dismissing out of hand the “bad man.”
If so-called
“good” men always brought good news, and so-called “bad” men always brought bad
news, we wouldn’t have to be very discerning, would we? Instead of
truth-seekers, we could just be “good-man-seekers.” But, obviously, that’s not
always the way it works. Therefore, we should learn to accept truth for what it
is–however, and by whomever, it may come to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment